Tomatoes: domestication and diversity What lies beneath does not reflect what you see

Slices of a ribbed tomato on a wooden cutting board

Podcast cover artwork

Plants of the weedy wild relatives of the tomato all look pretty much like one another, but under the surface they’re a seething mass of genetic diversity. That diversity — along with the discovery of truly wild tomatoes in Mexico — has allowed researchers to finally tell a story of tomato domestication that fits all the available evidence. In essence, people domesticated the tomato in the Amazonian areas of Excuador and Peru, but from wild material originally from Mexico. Traditional varieties, by contrast, are a feast of diversity for the eyes; size, shape and colour vary widely, but all that morphological diversity is not mirrored in genetic diversity. In fact, modern, scientifically-bred tomatoes are more diverse than traditional varieties, and almost a quarter of so-called traditional varieties are “tainted” by modern genetics.

Jose Blanca, one of the researchers involved in these two recent discoveries, told me more about what they found and what it means.

Notes

  1. The two papers we talked about are Haplotype analyses reveal novel insights into tomato history and domestication driven by long-distance migrations and latitudinal adaptations and European traditional tomatoes galore: a result of farmers’ selection of a few diversity-rich loci. Jose Blanca has also written a couple of articles (in Spanish) in The Conversation.
  2. Here is a PDF of the transcript.
  3. Extra music: Matamoscas from Blue Dot Sessions.
  4. Banner photo by me. Cover photo adapted from Berg’s Fairytale Garden’s Instagram feed.

huffduffer icon   Huffduff it

26 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *